This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Garden, R. M. Articles by Rees, F. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Garden, R. M. Articles by Rees, F. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Applying Cost Containment to a Public Correctional Medicine System

Utah Department of Corrections, P.O. Box 250, Draper, UT 84020; e-mail: rgarden{at}utah.gov

Blitch H. Shuman, RN

Michelle S. Buswell, RN

Steve J. Caverley, LCSW

Frank M. Rees, PhD

Utah Department of Corrections, Draper, Utah

Funds allocated as the result of a 1994 class action lawsuit involving the Utah Department of Corrections (UDC) established adequate funding for the provision of health care for Utah's incarcerated population. However, inflationary pressures along with increases in population size began to squeeze limited budgets and resulted in a $2.3 million dollar deficit by the fiscal year 2001. In response, UDC's Bureau of Clinical Services rigorously assessed this situation and began to forge a new direction for health care delivery that utilized private sector and other fundamental cost containment techniques. Those techniques included enforcement of strict pharmaceutical formularies, analysis of staffing patterns and productivity, flattening of the administration, creation of a pyramidal line of authority, and intense scrutiny and monitoring of all contracts. These efforts resulted in $250,000 saved in pharmaceutical costs, a 10% increase in staff productivity, reassignment of two senior-level administrative staff, and establishment of a physician bureau chief with authority over all administrative and clinical decisions. These reforms have resulted in $690,000 being cut from existing contracts (including pharmaceuticals) and a cumulative $1,474,000 savings (7.5%) from the previous year. It was concluded that despite the environment of escalating health care expenses, cutting costs can be realized while at the same time maintaining quality care and meeting the stringent criteria for National Commission on Correctional Health Care accreditation statewide.

Journal of Correctional Health Care, Vol. 9, No. 4, 441-452 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/107834580300900406


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. K. Miller Jail Health Assessment Practices: An Analysis of National Trends as Compared to National Commission on Correctional Health Care Recommendations Journal of Correctional Health Care, April 1, 2006; 12(2): 104 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Szykula and D. F. Jackson Managed Mental Health Care in Large Jails: Empirical Outcomes on Cost and Quality Journal of Correctional Health Care, April 1, 2005; 11(3): 223 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF]