Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Correctional Health Care
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1078345809340422v1
15/4/268    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Czachor, J. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webb, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Czachor, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

MRSA Prevention and Control in County Correctional Facilities in Southwestern Ohio

Jeffrey A. Webb, RS, MPH

Champaign Health District, Urbana, Ohio, webb882{at}sbcglobal.net

John S. Czachor, MD

Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio

The number of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in correctional facilities around the country has been increasing. Considering the potential health impact of MRSA, it is important that correctional facilities have prevention and control protocols in place. The study results summarize the prevention and control preparedness activities of county jails in the Greater Dayton area of Ohio. Protocols and control measures were in place for environmental control (95.4%), MRSA screening (88.4%), standard precautions (84.3%), treatment (83.6%), personal hygiene (80.6%), and education (80.4%). Statistical analysis found no significant difference between rural and urban county jails in their handling of MRSA issues. The findings suggest significant compliance with MRSA prevention and control protocols among county jails in the Greater Dayton area.

Key Words: MRSA • prevention • colonization • jail inmates • correctional health care

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Journal of Correctional Health Care, Vol. 15, No. 4, 268-279 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1078345809340422
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?