This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rold, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rold, W. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Thirty Years After Estelle v. Gamble: A Legal Retrospective

Prisoners' Rights Project of The Legal Aid Society in New York, wjroldesq{at}verizon.net

For more than three decades, beginning with Estelle v. Gamble in 1976, the courts have protected the constitutional right of prisoners to health care. This article explores the historical antecedents of this protection and its present application to modern correctional health care delivery. Focusing on the three basic rights guaranteed by Estelle—the right to access to care, the right to care that is ordered, and the right to a professional medical judgment—the article traces the development of case law in the hundreds of lawsuits that have influenced correctional health care over these years. The article also addresses the "state of mind" component of constitutional liability, the requirement of "serious medical needs" as a predicate to suit, and the impact of privatization on correctional health care delivery. Finally, the article describes the impact of litigation on the promulgation of standards for correctional health care services and on the accreditation of correctional health care systems.

Key Words: correctional health care • Estelle v. Gamble • Eighth Amendment • deliberate indifference

Journal of Correctional Health Care, Vol. 14, No. 1, 11-20 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1078345807309616


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?